California Gov. Gavin NewsomAfter Texas used similar tactics to limit abortion rights, (D) stated that he would like to allow private citizens to sue gun makers and dealers illegally.
“If the most efficient way to keep these devastating weapons off our streets is to add the threat of private lawsuits, we should do just that,” he said in a statement Saturday evening.
Newsom’s announcement follows the Supreme Court ruling Friday that Texas can continue to allow people to sue abortion clinics and anyone else who “aids or abets” abortions that take place after a fetal heartbeat can be detected. That’s typically around six weeks and often before people realize they are pregnant.
California has for many decades prohibited assault weapons being manufactured or sold in its state. A federal judge overturned this ban. likened the firearmsSwiss Army knives, the court ruled that the law was not constitutional in June.
Newsom took a swing at that judgment on Saturday while announcing his new strategy, which would borrow Texas’ mechanism of private-citizen enforcement (rather than state enforcement), a mechanism that has protected the state from lawsuits over the ban, despite its clear violation of Roe v. Wade.
“If states can now shield their laws from review by the federal courts that compare assault weapons to Swiss Army knives, then California will use that authority to protect people’s lives, where Texas used it to put women in harm’s way,” he said.
Newsom said he has asked his staff to work on a bill that would target those responsible for manufacturing assault-style weapons and firearms known as “ghost guns,” which are unserialized and untraceable. Private citizens would have the right to seek relief and damages of at least $10,000 per gun violation, plus costs and attorneys’ fees, he said.
Brian Dahle from Bieber is the State Senator. The Associated Press that Newsom’s plan could possibly pass the state’s Democratic-dominated state legislature but that he personally felt it was more of a publicity stunt ahead of Newsom possibly running for president.
“The right to bear arms is different than the right to have an abortion. A constitutional amendment does not grant the right to an abortion. So I think he’s way off base,” Dahle said. “I think he’s just using it as an opportunity to grandstand.”